Hughes Paddison is delighted to warmly welcome Heidi Aitken to the Equity Partnership. Here we celebrate her career so far and hear about her plans, as an Equity Partner.
- Telephone 01242 574244
- Fax 01242 221631
- Email info@hughes-paddison.co.uk
Search site
Contact our office
Make an enquiry
Blog
The principle of caveat emptor or ‘buyer beware’ is a principle that is familiar to many, although sometimes misunderstood. A recent appeal case has provided a reminder of how the Court will apply this principle.
Within the context of property purchases, the principle puts an obligation on the buyer to carry out its own investigations and to make its own enquiries prior to purchasing property. The buyer can then decide whether to proceed with the purchase based on the results of those investigations, and does so at its own risk.
There is however a duty on the seller to disclose any defects in title and any encumbrances of which the seller is aware. If the seller fails to do so, the buyer can rescind the contract.
The recent appeal case of SPS Groundworks and Building Limited v Mahil put this question in the spotlight.
Ms Mahil was an experienced property developer who contracted to purchase land from SPS Groundworks at auction. The land was described in the auction catalogue with the usual excitable sales hyperbole and also stated that:-
“There is excellent scope for development, subject to any required planning permission, making a superb investment opportunity.”
The auction pack contained a copy of the Land Registry title and also a copy of an overage deed. The inclusion of that overage deed turned out to be the focus of the dispute.
The overage deed provided that 50% of any increase in value resulting from the grant of planning permission for the land was to be paid to the Cooperative Group Limited.
Had Ms Mahil read through the auction pack, she would have seen this overage deed, and she would have understood its implications – ie the development potential of the land had a significant catch, namely the obligation to pay a large chunk of money to the Cooperative Group Limited.
Ms Mahil did not read through the auction pack. And that was rather silly one might argue, and in fact some did argue in this case.
The issue here was that although a copy of the overage deed was contained in the auction pack, there was no reference to the overage deed in the auction catalogue nor was any reference made to the overage agreement during the auction itself.
So the question here was whether enclosing a copy of the overage deed in the auction pack (the overage agreement being an encumbrance that the seller was required to disclose) was sufficient or whether the buyer could justifiably argue that burying this important document in the auction pack was unreasonable and that there needed to be a much clearer and more explicit reference to that overage agreement, either in the auction catalogue or during the auction itself.
Put simply, had the seller been clear enough with its disclosure?
Upon learning of the overage deed after the exchange of contracts, the buyer refused to complete the purchase. In response, the seller forfeited the buyer’s deposit and re‑sold the land to a third party for a lower price. The seller then brought a claim against the buyer seeking the difference between the original price and the price achieved at the ultimate sale.
The buyer argued that the seller had included the overage deed in the depths of the auction pack and that this was too hidden away to constitute proper disclosure.
The seller argued that had the buyer bothered to read the auction pack, she would have discovered the overage deed. It was her decision not to read the pack.
The Court agreed with the seller and ruled that including the overage deed in the auction pack was sufficient and that the overage deed was clearly “there to be seen”.
And this was where the case took a funny turn.
The buyer appealed the Court’s decision and insisted that it was, in a sense, unreasonable to expect the buyer to read the auction pack before the auction and to expect the buyer to discover this important overage deed in the depths of that auction pack.
For reasons that have led many to scratch their heads and quietly mutter with despair, the appeal Court agreed with the buyer and granted the appeal. The appeal Court held that the encumbrance should have been more specifically and clearly disclosed by the seller. The Court’s view was that such an important document as the overage deed should have been disclosed more clearly and openly.
The general consensus is that Ms Mahil got lucky. She admitted in the proceedings that she had not looked at the auction pack. She knew that the auction pack was important but she nevertheless proceeded to buy the land ‘blind’. It was only after exchanging contracts that she downloaded the legal pack and discovered the overage agreement.
The appeal Judge was clearly in a highly sympathetic mood as he declared that whether Ms Mahil had read the auction pack or not, a seller’s duty was to give full, frank and fair information about any encumbrance. The Judge’s view was that the overage deed had to be specifically brought to the buyer’s attention by a clear description in the sales particulars or by a specific reference made by the auctioneer. Since that had not happened, the seller had failed to comply with its duty of disclosure.
A surprising and rather unsatisfactory decision but whingeing about the decision gets one nowhere; there are lessons to be learnt. These include the following:-
If you have any queries in relation to matters raised in this blog, please contact Andrew Turner on 01242 586 841 or at aet@hughes-paddison.co.uk
The information contained on this page has been prepared for the purpose of this blog/article only. The content should not be regarded at any time as a substitute for taking legal advice.
Hughes Paddison is delighted to warmly welcome Heidi Aitken to the Equity Partnership. Here we celebrate her career so far and hear about her plans, as an Equity Partner.
What our clients say
“Hughes Paddison have provided assistance on numerous occasions consistently acting in an exemplary fashion whilst dealing with all aspects of the issue at hand. It is extremely reassuring to know that our company is represented by such a competent and professional firm.”– Commercial Director, Ferroli Limited
““Jennifer was most helpful, frequently explaining the legal jargon with ease and doing so in an effective manner. This very much helped me follow along with what at times seemed like a daunting process - Jennifer’s ability to explain things clearly made the whole process much easier to deal with.””– Anon
“Just a quick note to say a huge thankyou to both yourself and Jess for the service that you have given me over the last few months. It all seems to have been done with the minimum of fuss which has certainly taken away an element of stress that comes along with selling your house. I now see why you guys came as a recommendation and look forward to dealing with you both again when we purchase our new house next year.”– Anon
“Just a note to say thank you very much to you and your colleagues for dealing with the sale of our late Mum’s property. The service we received was excellent and you were able to resolve all the problems that cropped up!”– Anon
“Jennifer provided sound professional legal advice which I needed to help me to sort out the legal and financial aspects of a difficult personal situation. I wouldn't hesitate to go to her with any family legal matters I have in future.”– R
“Having the support of Marcus throughout what has been a very painful divorce has really helped me get through the last 18 months. Although this has personally been a very difficult process, I know that Marcus has done everything possible to make it as smooth as it can be. I really appreciate the honest, open feedback to all of my questions and also how quickly he responded to them. Above all else, Marcus really does seem to care about his clients and their families. I never had the feeling that this was just a job for Marcus, and I’m so grateful that I was fortunate enough to have had Marcus recommended to me when I did.”– R
“When you use a solicitor its usually in times of need, when you require expert advice and reassurance. This is exactly what our company has received from Hughes Paddison Solicitors and in particular Kimberly Whalen-Blake. Not only is Kimberly extremely well informed and professional; she is also personable and easy to communicate with. She responds to messages and emails promptly and goes over and above to assist. I would have no hesitation in recommending her services; and in the future, if necessary, I will definitely be calling on her expertise. ”– S - UK Parking Design
“ Hughes Paddison came highly recommended and they were not wrong. I am so glad I appointed Kim to represent me. It was a really difficult time and Kim swiftly and compassionately cut through to the crux of the issue and gave me such clear and great advice immediately. The outcome achieved was truly the best for myself and the organisation and avoided more stress for all parties involved, as it was solved very quickly. Most importantly for me, Kim handled the negotiations. The relief of handing this over to someone I completely trusted made a horrible situation much better. Many thanks to Kim and HP.”– Anon
We use essential cookies to make our site work. We'd also like to set analytics cookies that help us make improvements by measuring how you use the site. Clicking Reject All only enables essential cookies. For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies page. For further control over which cookies are set, please click here
Our use of cookies.
You can learn more detailed information in our Privacy Policy
Some cookies are essential, whilst others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used. The technology to maintain this privacy management relies on cookie identifiers. Removing or resetting your browser cookies will reset these preferences.
Essential Cookies
These cookies enable core website functionality, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.
Google Analytics cookies help us to understand your experience of the website and do not store any personal data. Click here for a full list of Google Analytics cookies used on this site.
Third-Party cookies are set by our partners and help us to improve your experience of the website. Click here for a full list of third-party plugins used on this site.
Comments